Reginald M Dawson posted a status
Jun 27, 2019
My lawsuit filed against the City of Jacksonville!!!




IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE 2019-CA-4547

DIVISION CV-C

REGINALD M DAWSON
Plaintiff

Vs.

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
(Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office, Municipal Code
Compliance)
Defendant
Article X, Section 13 of the Florida Constitution states; "Provision may be made by general law for bringing suit against the state as to all liabilities now existing or hereafter originating."

In accordance with Fla. Stat. 768.28, which states:
768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification; risk management programs.—
(1) In accordance with s. 13, Art. X of the State Constitution, the state, for itself and for its agencies or subdivisions, hereby waives sovereign immunity for liability for torts, but only to the extent specified in this act. Actions at law against the state or any of its agencies or subdivisions to recover damages in tort for money damages against the state or its agencies or subdivisions for injury or loss of property, personal injury, or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the agency or subdivision while acting within the scope of the employee’s office or employment under circumstances in which the state or such agency or subdivision, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant, in accordance with the general laws of this state, may be prosecuted subject to the limitations specified in this act. Any such action may be brought in the county where the property in litigation is located or, if the affected agency or subdivision has an office in such county for the transaction of its customary business, where the cause of action accrued.
I Reginald M. Dawson ask for the city of Jacksonville and the state of Florida to waive its right to sovereign immunity, and allow the claimant to seek equitable and just relief and compensation and tort relief listed in the act (and germane to conditions imposed on the Plaintiff), by officers and other city officials in conjunction with state and federal governmental agencies conducted and displayed with malice and intent.
The claimant, Reginald M. Dawson believes that the following conditions have been met:
1) The claim is for money damages [in this case the amount is equal to $300,000.00 (Three Hundred Thousand Dollars) sum certain, since the claim is against multiple state entities]. The amount shall not be instituted for any sum in excess of the amount of the claim presented to the city or state agency except whereas the increased amount is based on newly discovered evidence not reasonably discoverable at the time of presenting the claim to the city or state agency (or upon allegation and proof of intervening facts relating to the amount of the claim).
2) The damages are for (personal) injury and loss of property.
3) The damages were caused due to negligence, wrongful acts and omissions.
4) The wrongful actors were city, state and federal employees.
5) The government employees were acting within the scope and course of their employment.
6) The circumstances are such that if the individuals involved were private persons, liability would be imposed under the city, state and federal law as it exist where the wrongful act occurred.
The claimant did put the state agency involved in the claim (and the state's Department of Financial Services) on notice of the claim, in writing, within three years of the occurrence of the underlying incidents. It has been more than 180 days (investigation period) and the claim has NOT been formally denied. The failure of a denial offers the claimant the option to consider the government’s intentional disregard a final denial of his claim.
Some allegations are as follows.
- The claimant filed a formal eviction notice against David Curry because of his participation in poisoning me, for destruction of property and for his continual threats. (Case 17-CC-80512 Division Q). The claimant paid for the Jacksonville Sheriff’s office as is normal procedure in carrying out a formal eviction. The Jacksonville Sherriff’s Office refused to serve the eviction even thought it had been paid to do so and gave the impression that it would carry out that function in the process of evicting David Curry. The claimant also filed a stalking and harassment injunction that was denied. The government moved to have the case against David Curry dismissed. The city under normal circumstances would NOT have as serious an interest. The city also had served eviction notices at the same address before and after Case 17-CC-80512. The Judge, at the time of his ruling stated he would send a copy of his ruling yet has not. The city thru its actions have caused my finding recourse and/or compensation thru this case (17-CC-80512) impossible. David Curry caused direct and intentional damage to my property.

- Encouraging tenants to reside on my property and to openly use illegal drugs.
- Encouraging individuals to squat on my property without paying rent and committing illegal acts as well promoting injunctions against me. (JSO case 707970 – Officer 76525) also promoting harassment, slander (not considered in the amount for damages), abuse, torture.
- Applying unfair, complex and unclear demands of compliance thru the code enforcement process.
- Having little or no regarding pertaining to my allegation of being poisoned.
- (I have had over 10 people removed from my home thru the courts based on the grounds they were indeed poisoning me by a Notice from Landlord to tenant, a formal eviction where the evidence found was sufficient to grant an eviction (Case 2018-CC-8655 Div. CC-G), Case 18-CC-3385 Div. CC-Q, 18 CC 10474 Div. M, Case 18-cc-14091 Div. L., and injunctions - Case No: 16-2019-DR-002182-DVXX-MA
-
- Conspiring with neighbors to prevent my quiet enjoyment (including encouraging neighbor at to video tape me 24 hrs. a day, seven days a week and to use neighbors to assist in my poisoning and being harmed).

- The use of JSO outside of its scope and duty regarding my property and life.
- Directing JEA and other entities to act illegally, and in a non-fiduciary manner. Encouraging tenants to use excessive energy resources.

- Sabotage…which includes but is not limited to A/c unit which may have caused physical, personal and physiological damage to all individuals in my household.
- Allowing access to my home to uninvited individuals
- Other activities not named in this instrument.
- The claimant feels that additional information, damages and illegal acts will be uncovered during the discovery phase of this claim.
The claimant believes he has exhausted all administrative remedies.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing document has been served upon:
City of Jacksonville Municipal Code Compliance
Office of General Counsel 214 Hogan St
117 W. Duval St. Ste. 480 Jacksonville, Fl 32202
Jacksonville, Fl. 32202

Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office
501 W. Adams St.
Jacksonville, Fl. 32202



___________________________________
Reginald Maurice Dawson, pro se
7260 Arlet Dr.
Jacksonville, Fl. 32211
904-405-2490
Inquesttoknow@gmail.com
DOB 2/7/1962
SS# 244-23-2135
City of birth – Fayetteville, North Carolina
Fl. I.D. D250-733-62-047-0

In the STATE of FLORIDA, COUNTY OF DUVAL,
Personally appeared before me, Reginald Maurice Dawson and did in fact present a state of Florida Identification card, performed the preceding document and it is accepted that he signed the same as a voluntary act and action for the uses and purposes mentioned within.
Witness my hand and my official seal hereto affixed
This ____day of ____________, 2019.
_______________________________NOTARY PUBLIC
State of Florida
My commission expires on ___day________,______________


This instrument also serves to give notice to all involved or have influence, sway or autonomy that I do NOT consent to any experiments, research projects, government projects or any other ongoing government, educational, business related, quasi entities, and/or non-government acts or functions that may involve my health, mental acuity, mental capacity, I.Q., physical health and well-being or any other process that deals with my physical, mental, emotional and/or spiritual functions. This includes and is not limited to any operation not included in this notice.
"Human experimentation in the United States describes numerous experiments performed on human test subjects that have been considered unethical, and were often performed illegally, without the knowledge, or informed consent of the test subjects. Such tests have occurred throughout American history, but particularly in the 20th century. The experiments include: the exposure of humans to many chemical and biological weapons (including infection with deadly or debilitating diseases), human radiation experiments, injection of toxic and radioactive chemicals, surgical experiments, interrogation and torture experiments, tests involving mind-altering substances, and a wide variety of others. Many of these tests were performed on children,[1] the sick, and mentally disabled individuals, often under the guise of "medical treatment". In many of the studies, a large portion of the subjects were poor, racial minorities, or prisoners.[citation needed]
Funding for many of the experiments was provided by the United States government, especially the United States military, the Central Intelligence Agency, or private corporations involved with military activities.[2][3][4] The human research programs were usually highly secretive, and in many cases information about them was not released until many years after the studies had been performed.
The ethical, professional, and legal implications of this in the United States medical and scientific community were quite significant, and led to many institutions and policies that attempted to ensure that future human subject research in the United States would be ethical and legal. Public outrage in the late 20th century over the discovery of government experiments on human subjects led to numerous congressional investigations and hearings, including the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission, both of 1975 and the 1994 Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, among others."
“According to the law firm Bernhoft Law in Austin, Texas, contracts are taken out on victims to place innocent people on the (Terrorist) Watch List by asking the main Fusion Center to fabricate false allegations against the person in what is called “parallel construction”. Then the falsified information is sent to the nearest Fusion Center to the victim, to be used as the basis of vicious Infragard stalking harassment. Note: Infragard are mercenary civilians paid in gift cards and services by Fusion Centers through “partners” such as Lockheed Martin and others.

You need to be a member of SASN Social - Surveillance Abuse Survivors Network to add comments!

Join SASN Social - Surveillance Abuse Survivors Network

Live Support